Legal Opinion

Ward v. Ashbrook

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Common Bleas Court of Tipton, Moniteau County. — Hon. E. L. Edwards, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, C.

This was a suit for breach of covenant against incumbrances. By his deed of September 28th, 1869, the defendant conveyed the land in controversy to Mary J. Hardy and therein covenanted with her and her *516lieixs and assigns, that he was seized of an indefeasible estate in fee simple in the premises conveyed, and that said premises were free and clear from any incumbrances done or suffered by him or those under whom he, claimed, and that he had good right to convey the same. On the 23rd day of March, 1875, said Mary J. Ilardy conveyed the same to plaintiff* with the statutory covenants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickson v. Desire's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
  2. Kellogg v. MalinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  3. Magwire v. RigginSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
  4. Morgan v. Hann. & St. Jo. R. R.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  5. Williamson v. HallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aiple-Hemmelmann Real Estate Co. v. SpelbrinkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  2. Lambert v. EstesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  3. Hunt v. MarshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. Schnelle & Querl Lumber Co. v. BarlowU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1888
  5. Jones v. HaseltineMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API