United States v. Randy Mitchell
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Randy Mitchell appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo whether a district court has authority to modify a sentence under section 3582(c)(2), see United States v. Pleasant, 704 F.3d 808, 810 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 824, 187 L.Ed.2d 688 (2013), and we affirm.
Mitchell contends that he is eligible for a sentence reduction under Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines. This contention fails because Mitchell was sentenced as a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. WatersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Deon CharlesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014