Legal Opinion

State v. Burrell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 2004No. COA03-989Published

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Anthony Dywone Burrell (“Anthony”) and Rodney Matthew Burrell (“Rodney”) (collectively, “defendants”) appeal their convictions for first-degree kidnapping and robbery with a dangerous weapon. For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude that defendants received a trial free of prejudicial error.

The State’s evidence presented at trial tends to show the following: On the night of 10 April 2001, Hiroharu Okamoto (“Okamoto”) flew from New York to Greensboro, North Carolina, for a business meeting. Okamoto rented a vehicle and drove to the Park Lane Hotel, where he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. IrwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API