Legal Opinion · Concurrence

In re City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 11, 1939Published

1Concurrence

Carswell, J. (concurring).

When this case was here before I did not concur in the opinion of the court. I merely concurred in the result, which is not controlling on the question now presented. I concur in the opinion of Mr. Justice Close, with these observations:(a) The basic conclusion of Special Term is reinforced by the rule of strict construction applicable here. A patent or a grant from a sovereign to a subject is to be construed strictly in favor of the Crown. A different rule prevails where the grant is to a town or a political subdivision. (People v. Foote, 242 App. Div. 162; 273 N.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Beers v. HotchkissNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Allen v. Trustees of Great Neck Free ChurchNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. People v. FooteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. People v. Foote, Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API