Legal Opinion

Green v. Church of Immaculate Conception

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1936PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment dismissing complaint at the close of plaintiff’s case reversed upon the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Defendant owed plaintiff — an invitee — a duty of reasonable care. (Vaughan v. Transit Development Co., 222 N. Y. 79; Hudson v. Church of Holy Trinity, 250 id. 513.) While defendant was subject to no statutory duty to keep the vestibule and stairway lighted, it was for the jury to say whether defendant was negligent and the plaintiff free from contributory negligence. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Johnston and Taylor, JJ., concur; Carswell, J.,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Vaughan v. . Transit Development Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Grant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  3. Kiernan v. Roman Catholic Church of St. John EvangelistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. De Mello v. Saint Thomas the Apostle Church Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1960
  5. Kiernan v. Roman Catholic Church of St. John EvangelistAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API