Legal Opinion

Patten v. Patten

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 5, 1894PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Assumpsit, for fees paid to fence-viewers and for services in building a fence. Pacts agreed. November 26, 1868, John S. Sanborn conveyed one acre, parcel of his farm, to Thomas Eastman, by a deed containing a clause as follows : “ The conditions of this deed are that the said Thomas Eastman, his heirs and assigns, shall build and forever keep in repair the line fence between said Thomas Eastman and the said John S. Sanborn on the land above described.” The title to the farm has come to the plaintiff and that of the acre to the defendants, in each case through several mesne conveyances, in…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fowler v. KentSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API