New Phase Investments v. Jarvis and DAFCO
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
J. JONES, Justice.
This appeal arises from a dispute between two competing creditors, DAFCO, LLC, and New Phase Investments, LLC. DAFCO appeals from the district court’s determination on summary judgment that DAFCO’s deed of trust — although first recorded — was void under I.C. § 32-912 because it encumbered community real property but was not signed by both spouses. Because I.C. § 32-912 was enacted for the protection of the community rather than third-party creditors, we find that New Phase may not invoke that statute to void DAFCO’s competing encumbrance. We reverse.
I
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- State v. SchulzIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- MacKay v. Four Rivers Packing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
- Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Finlayson v. WallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
- Childs v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
- Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- DAFCO LLC v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
- Hayes v. MedioliIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
- DAFCO v. Stewart Title Guaranty CoIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.