Legal Opinion

New Phase Investments v. Jarvis and DAFCO

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 2012No. 38447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. JONES, Justice.

This appeal arises from a dispute between two competing creditors, DAFCO, LLC, and New Phase Investments, LLC. DAFCO appeals from the district court’s determination on summary judgment that DAFCO’s deed of trust — although first recorded — was void under I.C. § 32-912 because it encumbered community real property but was not signed by both spouses. Because I.C. § 32-912 was enacted for the protection of the community rather than third-party creditors, we find that New Phase may not invoke that statute to void DAFCO’s competing encumbrance. We reverse.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. SchulzIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. MacKay v. Four Rivers Packing Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Martin v. Camas County ex rel. Board of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Finlayson v. WallerIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Childs v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1921

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 2020
  2. Allen F. Grazer v. Gordon A. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. DAFCO LLC v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Hayes v. MedioliIdaho Supreme Court · 2021
  5. DAFCO v. Stewart Title Guaranty CoIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API