Legal Opinion

Hudson v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1914No. 18,632PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to the district court for Lancaster county: P. James Cosgrave, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

Plaintiff in error, a young man about 21 years old, was convicted of the offense of rape without violence upon one Anna Weise, a girl of 14 years of age. He was convicted and sentenced to a term of seven years in the penitentiary.

1. It is contended that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. The argument is that the story of the prosecuting witness is so uncertain that no reliance should be placed upon it, and that it was induced by pressure upon her mind and by statements made by the prosecuting officers. An examination of the testimony clearly shows that this assignment cannot…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Woodruff v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Leedom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Keezer v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Boling v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Onstott v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stapleman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Peery v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Griffith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  5. Smith v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API