Legal Opinion

McGlocklin v. United States

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided March 24, 1994No. CV 92-299-N-LMBPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

BOYLE, United States Magistrate Judge.

I

INTRODUCTION

This action seeking an award of monetary damages under negligence theories was brought by Plaintiffs Robert E. and Hazel P. McGlocklin, husband and wife (hereinafter “Plaintiffs” or “MeGlocklins”), against the United States of America. In this action, brought pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., the MeGlocklins alleged that United States customs officers were negligent in allowing Robert Adams, a Canadian fugitive, to pass…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Elias Attallah, Violeta Lajam De Attallah, and the Conjugal Partnership They Comprise v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
  4. Vera Zabala Clemente v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
  5. Alegria v. PayonkIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hazell,et al. v. BNSF Railway CompanyDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API