Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mobil Corp. v. Mallia

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 28, 2006No. 3D05-2194Published

1DissentRamirez, J.

I respectfully dissent because I do not agree that the trial court’s order departed from the essential requirements of law.

Simply stated, section 774.205(2), Florida Statutes (2005), specifically provides that for any pending claims, “the plaintiff must file the report and supporting test results at least 30 days before setting a date for trial.” (emphasis added). The majority would apply the statute to include cases whose trials have already been set. If that were the case, the statute should read “at least 30 days before trial.”

When considering such an extraordinary remedy as a writ of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Haines City Community Dev. v. HeggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. Allstate Ins. Co. v. LangstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  3. Globe Newspaper Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  4. Montgomery v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & REHAB. SERV.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  5. Merkle v. Guardianship of JacobyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API