Schieffelin v. . Hylan
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 6,1919, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite in a taxpayer’s action.
Read the full summary
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 6,1919, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite in a taxpayer’s action. The following questions were certified; “ 1. Has the board of estimate and apportionment of the city of New Yoik power to authorize the issuance of corporate stock of the city of New York to the amount of $4,500,000, under the resolution of February 7,1919, and to apply the proceeds thereof as provided by said resolution? “…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in negative. Third, fourth and seventh questions answered in affirmative. Fifth question answered in negative. The public service commission has made no sufficient requisition. Second and sixth questions not answered; no opinion.
Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ. Absent: Hogan, J.
2Cited by4 opinions
- Mareno v. KibbeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Stahl Soap Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Wilmerding v. LaGuardiaNew York Supreme Court · 1941
- Schieffelin v. . HylanNew York Court of Appeals · 1920