Vinsant v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Defendant made a motion to quash the indictment, which was overruled.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Conviction for bigamy; two years in the penitentiary. The charging part of the indictment is as follows: That appellant “did then and there unlawfully marry Martha M. Woodard, the said J. R. Vinsant then and there having a former wife then living.” With the exception of using the word “former,” this indictment is identical with that in McAfee v. State, 38 Texas Criminal Reports, 124. It was there held that, in order to constitute a sufficient indictment in this character of case, it should allege the name of the former wife or husband, and the subsequent marriage on…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Bryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Bryan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Edwards v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Henton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.