Legal Opinion
Brinker v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 7, 1991No. B054662PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ASHBY, J.
—The respondent court granted real party’s petition to vacate an arbitration award in petitioners’ favor. Petitioners seek a writ of mandate directing the respondent court to vacate its order.
Facts and Procedural History
Petitioners (the Brinkers), New Jersey residents, filed an action in the New Jersey Superior Court, Chancery Division, for specific performance and damages in connection with a real estate purchase contract. The Brinkers allege that they entered into a contract to purchase commercial real property in Lyndhurst, New Jersey for $3 million from real party Page…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- World Wide Imports, Inc. v. BartelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Gregory Marketing Corp. v. Wakefern Food Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- United Bank of Denver v. K & W TRUCKING CO.California Court of Appeal · 1983
- Silbrico Corp. v. RaananCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Washoe Development Co. v. Guaranty Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Liquidator of Integrity Ins. Co. v. HendrixCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- R.S. v. Pacificare Life & Health InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Connolly v. Connolly (In re Connolly), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.