Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Clark

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 14, 1923No. 11232Published

1Opinion of the Court

May 14, 1923. The opinion of the Court was delivered by This is an appeal from orders of Hon. W.H. Townsend, Circuit Judge, dated June 12, 1922, and July 5, 1922, refusing the petitioner's demand for dower in the proceeds of the sale of certain property sold under the decree of Judge Peurifoy in the main cause, dated April 7, 1922.

The proceedings in the main cause have so fully been detailed in the opinion of the writer filed in the matter ofEx Parte Columbia Savings Bank Trust Co. and NicholsonBank Trust Co., 118 S.E. ___, at this term, that a repetition thereof is unnecessary. The statement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McMahan v. McMahonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  2. Matthews v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  3. Geiger v. GeigerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1900
  4. Grube v. LilienthalSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  5. Watson v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API