Legal Opinion

Dorrington v. Jacobs

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

When a person pays a valuable consideration for property which he causes to be deeded directly to another, no trust or use results in favor of him by whom such payment is made, but the title vests in the person named as the grantee in such conveyance. Should the person paying the consideration then be a debtor, the conveyance is presumed fraudulent as against his creditors, and if a fraudulent intent is not disproved a trust results in favor, of such creditors to the extent necessary to satisfy their just demands. Secs. 231.07 and 231.08, Stats.

*525The learned trial judge ruled, and in our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cornell v. RadwayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Wadsworth v. SchisselbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Miner v. LaneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Allen v. McRaeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  5. State Bank of La Crosse v. BienfangWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. D.H.R. Construction Co. v. DonnellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Young v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  3. General Kontrolar Co. v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. Westminster Savings Bank v. SaubleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Bedell v. SteeleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API