Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Columbia Improvement Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1905No. 5S63PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Huston, J., entered April 6, 1905, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the defendants, by direction of the court, dismissing an action for injuries sustained by an employee in falling a tree.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

Action for personal injuries. At the trial of the case, when the plaintiff had introduced all his evidence, the lower court directed a verdict on motion of the defendants. Plaintiff appeals.

The facts are substantially as follows: During the summer of 1903, the respondents were constructing an electric *84power and light transmission line in Pierce county. About the 1st of July, appellant was employed as a common laborer in clearing the right of way of logs, brush, and timber along respondents-’ line. Appellant came to this country from ISTorway in June of 1903. At the time he was employed by…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Engelking v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Deaton v. AbramsWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Engirbritson v. Tri-State Cedar Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hagins v. Southern Bell Telephone &c. Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Davis v. W. T. Carter & Bro.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API