Legal Opinion
The People v. Michael E. Prindle
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 29, 2017No. 84PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Wilson, J.
“This appeal presents another Apprendi challenge to New York’s discretionary persistent felony offender sentencing scheme. The primary issue before us is whether, in light of [Alleyne v United States (570 US —, 133 S Ct 2151 [2013])], this sentencing scheme violates Apprendi [v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000])] and defendant’s due process and Sixth Amendment rights. We again uphold the constitutionality of New York’s discretionary persistent felony offender sentencing scheme and further hold that defendant’s constitutional rights were not violated” (People v…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. BanksNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
- People v. DudleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- People v. LagoaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- People v. RodneyNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
- People v. BanksNew York Supreme Court, New York County · 2024
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.