Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Gloria

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided September 16, 1981No. NMCM 81 1837Published

1DissentGladis, Senior Judge

I dissent. In this case appellate Government counsel has moved to set aside the findings and sentence, authorizing a rehearing, because the accuser was the reporter. I agree with the accused and the Government that the decision of the Court of Military Appeals in United States v. Moeller, 8 U.S.C.M.A. 275, 24 C.M.R. 85 (1957), requires this result.

In Moeller, the Court held that assignment of a nominal accuser as reporter is an error of sufficient moment to warrant reversal of the findings and sentence. See also United States v. Martinez, 11 U.S.C.M.A. 224, 29 C.M.R. 40 (1960); United States…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HeflinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. TuckerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
  3. United States v. MartinezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. CunninghamUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  5. United States v. MoellerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API