Legal Opinion
Trautwein v. Bozzo
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 28, 1956PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
39 N.J. Super. 267 (1956)
120 A.2d 788
RAYMOND TRAUTWEIN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
JAMES J. BOZZO AND MODESTO BOZZO, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 20, 1956.
Decided February 28, 1956.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Dimon, Haines & Bunting, attorneys).
Mr. Robert E. Dietz argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Powell & Davis, attorneys; Mr. James M. Davis, Jr., of counsel).
The opinion of the court was delivered PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Medical Fabrics Co. v. DC McLintock Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Trautwein v. BozzoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berman v. GurwiczNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- Pharmaceutical Sales and Consulting Corp. v. JWS Delavau Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
- Walid v. IRENE COUTURE, INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Byrne v. Weichert RealtorsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
- Selective Builders, Inc. v. Hudson City Savings BankNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.