Legal Opinion

Rucker v. Hyde

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1906PublishedCited by 2 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from tbe Chancery Conrt of Davidson County. —Johin Allison, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

This is an ejectment bill to recover the possession of a tract of land in Davidson county and also for the purpose of removing clouds from the complainant’s title. The chancellor and the court of chancery appeals concurred in pronouncing a decree in favor of complainants. The defendants appealed and have assigned errors. The facts appearing from the report of the court of chancery appeals are:

*360That on December 19, 1894, and prior thereto, the defendant Wee Hyde was the owner of the land in litigation. On that date Hyde and wife conveyed the land in trust to H. 0. Passing to secure a note for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Naugher v. SparksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  2. Williamson v. Mayer Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1897
  3. Wilcox v. BlackwellTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Swainson v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cleveland v. BatemanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Mitchell v. SherrellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API