Legal Opinion

Oregon Short Line Railroad v. Hallock

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 1912No. 2361PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. O. W. Morsa, Judge. Action by the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company against E. S. Iialloek and another. Judgment for defendant Plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, C. J.

On the 21st day of October, 1905, appellant commenced this action to quiet the title to a part of lot 6, block 81, plat A, Salt Lake City Survey. The portion of lot 6 in question is the portion markedi “X” in the following plat:

*381Tbe action, for some reason not disclosed by the record, was permitted to lie dormant until last December, when it was tried to the court, and on the 15th day of January, 1912, findings of fact and judgment were duly entered.

The material and undisputed facts in substance, are: That in June, 1902, appellant commenced a proceeding under our statute in the district court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Severin v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1874
  2. Clother v. MaherNebraska Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Houck v. GueNebraska Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burton v. HooverUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bolognese v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Utah Lead Co. v. Piute CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Adams v. LamicqUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Crystal Lime & Cement Co. v. RobbinsUtah Supreme Court · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API