Legal Opinion

Hays v. Montesano Mill Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1915No. 12409PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Sheeks, J., entered January 24., 1914., upon sustaining a demurrer to the complaint, dismissing an action to foreclose a materialman’s lien.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

On May 18, 1911, the respondent Montesano Lumber & Manufacturing Company, being then the owner of certain mill property, leased the same to J. W. Sumrall, A. B. Crosier, and A. K. Foss, for a term of three years, at a rental of $300 per month. The lease was in writing and contained, among others, the following conditions:

“It is agreed that whereas the said mill at this time needs new machinery and equipment, that second parties shall furnish as advance payment upon said rent, certain machinery and equipment, a list of which has this day been agreed upon, which machinery and equipment, with…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colby & Dickinson, Inc. v. BakerWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Spokane Valley Lumber & Box Co. v. DawsonWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Robinson Tile & Marble Co. v. SamuelsWashington Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API