Legal Opinion

Knupp v. Miller

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided July 1, 1993No. 09-92-170 CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BROOKSHIRE, Justice.

The form of the action was in the nature of a trespass to try title case. More importantly, the suit was to recover the value of timber that was wrongfully cut and removed from a tract of land. As well, the plaintiff below sought damages for the cost and expense of restoring the land to its former condition. A juried proceeding resulted in the jury questions being answered favorably to the plaintiff below, A.A. Miller, appellee here.

In fact, the jury answered all the issues favorably to appellee. The jury found for the appellee on several statutes of limitations…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Cropper v. Caterpillar Tractor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Land v. TurnerTexas Supreme Court · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Ricane Enterprises, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  2. Belew v. Rector, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2006
  3. Llanes v. Davila, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  4. Argee Corp. v. Solis, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
  5. Gaut v. Daniel, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API