Legal Opinion

Fox v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 2011No. 08-CF-1376, 08-CF-1377, 08-CF-1499PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Associate Judge:

A jury convicted appellants Terrence Fox, Maurice Smith, and Donnell Stewart of multiple charges stemming from their armed robbery of a liquor store and the ensuing car chase. 1 On appeal, appellant Stewart asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, for the “while armed” element of armed robbery, and for possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. In addition, he argues that the jury instruction on aiding and abetting liability was erroneous and that his convictions for reckless driving…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  5. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Leon Robinson and Shanika Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Napper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. Paige v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API