Fox v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Associate Judge:
A jury convicted appellants Terrence Fox, Maurice Smith, and Donnell Stewart of multiple charges stemming from their armed robbery of a liquor store and the ensuing car chase. 1 On appeal, appellant Stewart asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions for unlawful possession of a firearm by a felon, for the “while armed” element of armed robbery, and for possession of a firearm during a crime of violence. In addition, he argues that the jury instruction on aiding and abetting liability was erroneous and that his convictions for reckless driving…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Donnelly v. DeChristoforoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Tyrone Gaither v. United States of America, Charles Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Michael D. Tann v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Leon Robinson and Shanika Robinson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
- Napper v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- English v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Paige v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.