Legal Opinion
Armando Navarro-Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 31, 2006No. 04-70345PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEAVY, Circuit Judge:
Armando Navarro-Lopez petitions for review of a final order of removal, arguing that the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) erred in summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (IJ) determination that Navarro-Lopez’s conviction under California Penal Code § 32 for accessory after the fact was a conviction involving a crime of moral turpitude. Based on this conviction, the BIA concluded that Navarro-Lopez was inadmissible and ineligible for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction, and we deny the petition for review.
FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
Navarro-Lopez is a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roberts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Enrique Cuevas-Gaspar v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Kykhosro Notash v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jose Carlos Gonzalez-Alvarado v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Robles-Urrea v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- ROBLESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2006
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Armando Navarro-Lopez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Navarro-Lopez v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.