Legal Opinion
Surprise v. GTE Service Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1999No. 3:98CV255(JBA)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND [DOC. # 8]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
The Complaint of plaintiffs, Richard Surprise and Donald Ginsberg, asserts several state and federal law claims based on the events preceding, during and following their termination from the Defendant employer including Defendant’s refusal to rehire them. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), Defendant removed this action to Federal District Court from the Superior Court for the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk at Stamford on the basis that “this Court has original jurisdiction over the State Court Action pursuant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- No. 94-3025Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of New Rochelle v. Town of MamaroneckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Doll v. U.S. West Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2000
- Nelson v. CITY OF ROCHESTER, NYDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
- Priddy v. City of Newton FallsDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024