Legal Opinion

Frankenstein v. Acme Inv. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1935No. 1499PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRISSOM, Justice.

The appellant, A. J. Frankenstein, sued the appellees, Acme Investment Company and others, for a malicious conversion of his automobile, for damages to appellant’s nervous system, for humiliation, loss of reputation and credit, and exemplary damages. After the filing of appellant’s third amended original petition, the appellee Acme Investment Company filed its answer, consisting of a general demurrer and general denial. Thereafter, it filed its second amended answer to said pleading of appellant, which answer contained numerous exceptions to appellant’s said petition. Many of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fort Worth Elevators Co. v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Oliver v. ChapmanTexas Supreme Court · 1855
  3. Fowler v. StoneumTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Drake v. BranderTexas Supreme Court · 1852
  5. Texas N. O. R. Co. v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wood v. Fulton Property Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Kittrell v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Kittrell v. BarbeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API