Legal Opinion

Nance v. Ferraro

Court of Appeals of Nevada

Decided April 5, 2018No. 72454PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, SILVER, C.J.:

In this appeal, we consider whether the district court in a custody modification and child relocation action properly granted a motion in limine to exclude, among other things, evidence of domestic violence under McMonigle v. McMonigle, 110 Nev. 1407, 887 P.2d 742 (1994), and Castle v. Simmons, 120 Nev. 98, 86 P.3d 1042 (2004).1 Respondent Christopher Ferraro moved to modify custody and relocate the parties' minor child, and when appellant Sandra Nance opposed the motion, Christopher filed a motion in limine to exclude facts that occurred before the prior custody…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ellis v. CarucciNevada Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Rivero v. RiveroNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Murphy v. MurphyNevada Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Castle v. SimmonsNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Rennels v. RennelsNevada Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. MONAHAN v. HOGAN (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  2. MYERS v. HASKINS (CHILD CUSTODY)Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  3. ROMANO v. ROMANO (CHILD CUSTODY) C/W 81439Nevada Supreme Court · 2022
  4. ROMANO v. ROMANO (CHILD CUSTODY) C/W 81439Nevada Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API