Legal Opinion

McCunney v. Gardner

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided February 24, 1967No. 16115PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

The appellant is an unsuccessful claimant of social security benefits for her children. The district court granted summary judgment denying the claimant judicial relief. The record shows that the claimant did not within the time required by law take the prescribed steps to obtain a full administrative hearing upon or review of the merits of her claim. Thereafter, the appellee’s denial of a subsequent petition to reopen the matter was not an appealable order. Filice v. Celebrezze, 9th Cir., 1963, 319 F.2d 443. In the circumstances the courts cannot properly assist her.

The…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Frank H. Filice v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mary M. Brockman v. Robert H. Finch, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  2. Pasquale v. CohenDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Agatha Shelton v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
  4. Burge v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
  5. Fyfe v. FinchDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API