Dadeland Family Planning Center, Inc. v. Cash
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm the trial court’s determination that appellant failed to demonstrate excusable neglect, see Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour Lines, 492 So.2d 1117 (Fla. 3d DCA), review dismissed, 497 So.2d 1217 (Fla.1986); Bayview Tower Condominium Ass’n, Inc. v. Schweizer, 475 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), and was therefore not entitled to vacation of the default. The second amended complaint, although not artfully pled, is not fundamentally flawed, Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.120(c), and contains sufficient allegations against appellant to support the trial court’s denial. Appellant’s remaining point…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bayview Tower Condo. Ass'n v. SchweizerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Orlando Partners, Ltd. v. Classic Tour LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
3Cited by1 opinion
- Johnston v. HallidayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987