Legal Opinion

McMahan & Co. v. Harbert's Administrators

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Colorado. Tried below before the Hon. L. Lindsay. The material facts are indicated in the opinion of the court, and in the second head-note.

1Opinion of the CourtWalker, J.

This is an action by T. H. McMahan & Co., brought in the district court against the administrators de bonis non of the estate of Wm. Harbert, deceased, to enforce the payment of a debt created by a former administrator, Thomas C. Harbert. Thomas C. Harbert, it would appear, qualified as the administrator of his father Wm. Harbert’s estate, in the year 1865 ; that during that year and the year 1866, he carried on a large plantation, which belonged to his father’s estate; that during a portion of the time he was absent from the estate; and that Stephen Harbert, one of the defendants to this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Francis v. NorthcoteTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Montgomery v. CultonTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Montgomery v. CultonTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. State v. ShwartzTexas Supreme Court · 1860
  5. McKinney v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Alliance Milling Co. v. Eaton, Guinan & Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Sherman v. El Paso Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Estate of Hubberd v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  4. Ramirez v. First State Bank & Trust Co. of Rio Grande CityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Roberts v. KennaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API