Legal Opinion

Mulloy v. Charlestown Five Cents Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 2, 1934PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

The plaintiff declared in two counts for money had and received, to recover money deposited in the defendant bank by one Mary Kiernan. On the bank’s answer in interpleader that the deposits were claimed by a son of Mary Kiernan, administrator of her estate, and that it was a mere stakeholder ready to pay to the person entitled, the court summoned in the administrator as a claimant defendant. The trial judge found for the plaintiff for the first deposit; and for the administrator for the second. No *104question arises on the first count. The Appellate Division of the Municipal Court of the City of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moss v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Robinson v. PeroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Jones v. Old Colony Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  4. Perry v. LeveroniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Brodrick v. O'ConnorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. O'Hara v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Reardon v. WhalenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Cohen v. Newton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Rock v. RockMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  5. Cartall v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API