Leonard's Ex'ors v. Winslow
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. - Replevin for 400 tons -teas, pig metal, which plaintiffs below allege that they purchased from D. B. Long & Co. (Long, Church & Carothers,) in payment of a debt of Jesse Carothers, and that they are entitled to the iron now in dispute, under and by virtue of that contract.
Read the full summary
Error to the District Court of Allegheny county. - Replevin for 400 tons -teas, pig metal, which plaintiffs below allege that they purchased from D. B. Long & Co. (Long, Church & Carothers,) in payment of a debt of Jesse Carothers, and that they are entitled to the iron now in dispute, under and by virtue of that contract. The following is a copy of the agreement under which plaintiffs claim, viz: “Pittsburgh, May 22, 1851. “ We have this day sold to Winslow, Lanier & Co., 400 tons pig metal, now at our landing at Washington Furnace, or that will soon be delivered there, (Clarion county.) And…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered J anuary 9, 1857, by
Lewis, C. J.
— The plaintiff in error has neglected to furnish us in his paper book, with “ the verdict of the jury, and judgment thereon,” as required by the first of the rules of court, adopted on the 6th of September, 1852. In the specifications of error, he has omitted to state the parts of the charge excepted to, as required by the seventh of the rules already mentioned. The assignments of error must therefore, according to the requirements of rule 8th, be “held the same as none.”
But we perceive no error whatever in the charge,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Sharpsville Furnace Co. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Rowland v. Slate & MoyerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868