Legal Opinion

Kuhnle v. Rusmisel

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 1960No. 570PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraweord, J.

This appeal on questions of law arises in a suit for partition of premises owned by plaintiff-appellant and by Earl W. Kuhnle, defendant-appellees’ decedent.

A motion to the second amended petition was, by consent of counsel, treated as a demurrer and was sustained by tbe court with respect to certain claims of lien asserted by plaintiff.

It was alleged that plaintiff had made payments aggregating $1,080 on a first mortgage given to tbe Third Savings & Loan Company of Piqua, Ohio. Plaintiff says that “she and tbe defendant, tbe Third Savings & Loan Company of Piqua, Ohio, are tbe owners” of tbe…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beach v. MiznerOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Cox v. Boulger, Admr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1945

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Union-Lehman Bros.-Bank of Am. Commercial Mtge. Trust v. Pillar Real Estate Advisors, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. In re Estate of PhilhowerHamilton County Probate Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API