SAIF Corp. v. Danboise
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.
Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board affirming the award of permanent partial disability to claimant. Employer contends that the Board applied an incorrect standard of proof in evaluating the claim. We conclude that the Board applied the correct standard, and that under that standard, substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings concerning the extent of claimant’s impairment. Accordingly, we affirm the Board.
Claimant injured his neck in September 1993, while working for employer. Employer accepted the claim and, ultimately, the Board affirmed the…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Khrul v. Foremans CleanersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- SAIf Corp. v. AltonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- SAIF Corp. v. GaffkeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
- Office Depot, Inc. v. JoerresCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Sisters of Providence v. McGuireCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.