Legal Opinion

Cogswell v. Aiken

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 29, 1951No. Nos. 1078, 1079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Appellee, E. M. Aiken, has filed a motion to reconsider our decision in these cases or in the alternative to modify o.ur opinion. We have concluded that the motion to modify should be granted in certain respects which were not mentioned previously in either briefs or oral argument.

We ordered that the findings in both cases as to rent overcharges be reversed and the trial court was directed to enter judgment on the counterclaims for defendants “in accordance with law.” The trial court was also instructed to make findings as to the amounts owing by plaintiff to…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Aiken v. Cogswell (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API