Stockmeier v. State, Board of Parole Commissioners
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Hardesty, J.:
This proper person appeal and counsel cross-appeal arise from appellant’s attempts to have certain factual statements in his pre-sentence investigation report (PSI) amended to correct alleged factual inaccuracies. The primary question we are called on to decide is whether, under Nevada law, a prisoner may seek to amend his PSI after he has been sentenced. Because Nevada lacks a statutory or administrative process by which a prisoner may challenge alleged inaccuracies in his PSI post-sentencing, we conclude that any claimed inaccuracy in a PSI must be made to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
- Ruth Bauer v. The State of Texas, the Presiding Judge of Probate Court Number 3 of Harris County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
- Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Toston v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
- William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
- State, Department of Taxation v. Chrysler Group LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Sullivan v. Lincoln Cnty. Water Dist.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
- BLANKENSHIP (LERON) VS. STATE C/W 66944Nevada Supreme Court · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.