Legal Opinion

Stockmeier v. State, Board of Parole Commissioners

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2011No. 52099PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Hardesty, J.:

This proper person appeal and counsel cross-appeal arise from appellant’s attempts to have certain factual statements in his pre-sentence investigation report (PSI) amended to correct alleged factual inaccuracies. The primary question we are called on to decide is whether, under Nevada law, a prisoner may seek to amend his PSI after he has been sentenced. Because Nevada lacks a statutory or administrative process by which a prisoner may challenge alleged inaccuracies in his PSI post-sentencing, we conclude that any claimed inaccuracy in a PSI must be made to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States Department of Justice v. JulianSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Wood v. Safeway, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Ruth Bauer v. The State of Texas, the Presiding Judge of Probate Court Number 3 of Harris County, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  5. Chavez v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2009

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Toston v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
  2. William Thomas McFarland v. Michael S. PembertonTennessee Supreme Court · 2017
  3. State, Department of Taxation v. Chrysler Group LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Sullivan v. Lincoln Cnty. Water Dist.Nevada Supreme Court · 2024
  5. BLANKENSHIP (LERON) VS. STATE C/W 66944Nevada Supreme Court · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API