Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Quarles

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 5, 1975No. 30,244PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FERGUSON, Senior Judge:

Appellant has urged before this Court that his conviction by special court-martial for disobeying the lawful order of Personnelman First Class Nordlund, his superior *232petty officer, to go to colors, in violation of Article 92(2) of the Code,1 must be set aside and that charged offense dismissed because of its alleged failure to charge appellant with his “ultimate offense” — a failure to go to his appointed place of duty, in violation of Article 86(1).2 We do not agree.

Appellant argues that:

If a man disobeys an order to do that which he already had a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. LoosUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954
  2. United States v. BratcherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. LarneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. WartsbaughUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972
  5. United States v. BuckmillerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. United States v. DossUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. PettersenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  3. United States v. PettersenU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982
  4. United States v. LandwehrUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
  5. United States v. TraxlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API