Holman v. State

VOIGT, Chief Justice.

[11] Daniel Ray Holman ("the appellant") pled guilty to one count of third or subsequent possession of a controlled substance, specifically, methamphetamine, in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 85-7-1081(c)M) (LexisNexis 2007), reserving his right to appeal the district court's denial of his motion to suppress evidence seized during the search of his car at the time of his arrest.1 We reverse because the search of the appellant's vehicle violated the appellant's right to be free from unreasonable search under Article 1, Section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution.

ISSUE

[12]…