Legal Opinion

Frumkin v. Chemtop

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1998PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff has a prescriptive easement over a portion of the defendants’ real property, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rappaport, J.), dated November 16, 1997, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the counterclaims are severed, and the action is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for the entry of a judgment declaring that the plaintiff does not have a prescriptive…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Hassinger v. KlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  4. Wechsler v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. Weinberg v. ShaflerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Walsh v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. 315 Main Street Poughkeepsie, LLC v. WA 319 Main, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Gilliland v. Acquafredda Enterprises, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. Almeida v. WellsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Tarr v. DelsenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API