Tinsley v. Canterbury Shopping Center

By JUDGE E. BALLARD BAKER

A basic issue is what legal rights Richmond Fixture and Equipment had in certain restaurant equipment on April 15, 1971, and whether those rights have been improperly infringed upon by the sale conducted at the request of Canterbury Shopping Center. The chronology of events, and my views as to the consequences, are as follows:

October 5, 1967 - Canterbury Shopping Center, as landlord, leased premises under construction to.Canterbury Old English Pub, Michael W. Matzuk, President of the tenant. Paragraph 10 gave the landlord a lien on fixtures or equipment placed or…