Legal Opinion

Fortune Insurance Co. v. Iriban

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 11, 1992No. 91-1114PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We reverse the final judgment awarding attorney’s fees to plaintiffs first attorney because (1) plaintiff’s insurance benefits were not wrongfully withheld, Ledesma v. Bankers Ins. Co., 573 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Obando v. Fortune Ins. Co., 563 So.2d 116 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); § 627.736(4)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989), and (2) counsel stipulated that he would “retain a charging lien for services rendered and costs incurred on behalf of plaintiff. Said interest shall be satisfied from any court award made in the event the plaintiff prevails in this action.”

Reversed.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Obando v. Fortune Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
  2. Ledesma v. Bankers Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tristar Lodging, Inc. v. Arch Speciality InsuranceDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006