Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 13, 1984No. 1420 C.D. 1983Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Judge MacPhail :

I concur with that part of the majority opinion which overrules the preliminary objections of the Commonwealth but I respectfully dissent to that portion of the majority opinion which overrules the preliminary objections of Penn Center and 220 West. It is my opinion that our recent decision in Summit House Condominium v. Department of Revenue, 84 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 291, 479 A.2d 1162 (1984), wherein I dissented, controls the ultimate result in the instant case and renders moot PECO’s suit against Penn Center and 220 West. I accordingly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Summit House Condominium v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API