Legal Opinion

BMO Bank NA v. Raiden LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 27, 2023No. 2:23-cv-01465Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 BMO Bank N.A., CASE NO. 23-cv-01465 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: DEFAULT JUDGMENT 9 v. 10 RAIDEN, LLC, a Washington limited 11 liability company; and MIKHAIL GOIMAN a/k/a MIHAI GOIMAN and the marital 12 community composed of MIKHAIL GOIMAN and JANE or JOHN DOE 13 GOIMAN, 14 Defendants. 15 16 I 17 INTRODUCTION 18 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Entry of Judgment 19 on Default Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1) and LCR 55(b)(3). Dkt. # 32. The motion is 20 unopposed. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Gary R. Eitel v. William D. McCoolCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Alvera M. Aldabe v. Charles D. AldabeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. Televideo Systems, Inc. K. Philip Hwang C. Gemma Hwang v. Fred P. Heidenthal, Individually and Dba South Harbor Investors and West Cliff SecuritiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  4. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  5. DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa HuynhCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API