Legal Opinion

In Re Sammy Saenz v. the State of Texas

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided March 28, 2025No. 13-25-00142-CRPublished

1Opinion of the Court

NUMBER 13-25-00142-CR COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE SAMMY SAENZ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Tijerina and Justices West and Cron Memorandum Opinion by Justice West1 By pro se petition for writ of mandamus, relator Sammy Saenz seeks to compel the trial court to delete a deadly weapon finding in his judgment of conviction because it was not alleged in the indictment. Specifically, relator contends that the indictment stated that relator used a stun gun as a deadly weapon while committing aggravated…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ater v. Eighth Court of AppealsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Padieu, Philippe, Relator v. Court of Appeals of Texas, 5th DistrictCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. In Re Briscoe, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006
  4. In Re Harrison, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API