Legal Opinion

Reilly v. Manhattan Railway Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from special term, New York county. Action by Ann Reilly against the Manhattan Railway Company and another for an injunction and damages. There was a judgment in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Per curiam

It is urged by the appellants that the learned court erred because it states, among its grounds for the decision, that the value of so much of the plaintiff’s easements belonging to the premises No. 922 Third avenue, over and above the value of any and all general and special benefit to said premises arising from the construction, maintenance, and operation of said elevated railroad in front of them, as was taken by defendants, was and is the sum of $1,200. It is claimed that this statement is clear and positive that the value of the easements taken, over and above any benefits conferred on…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. President of Manhattan Co. v. CocheoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  2. Pistell, Deans & Co. v. ObletzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. Crowell v. CohenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934
  4. Hirsch v. JacobyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API