Legal Opinion

Valdastri v. City of Bath

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided February 25, 1987PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCOLNIK, Justice.

The defendant, City of Bath (City), appeals from a judgment entered by the Superior Court (Sagadahoc County) in favor of the plaintiffs, Joseph and Michelle Val-dastri. The Superior Court reversed a decision of the Bath Zoning Board of Appeals (Board) denying the plaintiffs’ application for a conditional use permit. We dismiss the appeal for want of final judgment.

I

This case was brought before the Superi- or Court for appellate review pursuant to Rule 80B of the Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. The Board had rejected the plaintiffs’ application for a conditional use permit…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Wheeler v. Maine Unemployment Insurance CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bard v. Bath Iron Works Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  2. Tizz Crowley-King v. Kennebec Valley Radiology, P.A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. Cooley v. PowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API