Legal Opinion

Gaspin v. Browning

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 17, 1972No. [No. 346, September Term, 1971.]PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDlGGES, J.

The only issues involved in this appeal from the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County (Mathias, J.) are whether appellants, Howard L. Gaspin and his mother, Tillie Gaspin, were entitled to receive warning of an impending deed of trust foreclosure sale under Maryland Rule W74 a 2 (b) and, if so, were they in fact given such notice. Since under our view this rule did not require that the Gaspins be given notification of the sale, there is no necessity to reach the second question.

On May 27, 1964 The Paramount Realty Company executed a deed of trust conveying to trustees commercial property…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Simpler v. State, Use of BoydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  2. Williams v. Associated Professors of Loyola CollegeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Arundel Supply Corp. v. CasonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
  4. Butler v. DaumCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Better v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scoville Service, Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  2. Singer Co., Link Simulation Systems Division v. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Sleph v. RadtkeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Garland v. HillCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API