Legal Opinion
Motykie v. Motykie
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided April 11, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01779Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Kevin D. Motykie, et al., Plaintiff No. 23 CV 1779 v. Judge Jeremy C. Daniel Gary Motykie, M.D., et al., Defendant ORDER The Court grants the motion to dismiss [23] filed by the Village of Inverness and its police officers. The Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars this Court from exercising subject matter jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ federal claims. In the absence of a viable federal claim, the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the plaintiffs’ state law claims. This matter is therefore…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Albertine Kirksey, of the Estate of Curtis Kirksey v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company and Lorillard Tobacco Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.