Legal Opinion
Grubart v. Shalala
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 1996No. 94 Civ. 0307 (PKL)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge:
This is an action brought under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (“the Act”), to review a final decision of the Secretary of Health and Human Services that plaintiff pro se was entitled under the Act to an award of wife’s benefits for the period beginning in November 1990 (the month she applied), but not to such benefits beginning in August 1990 (the first month she was eligible). The Secretary has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). The Court referred this motion to the Honorable Sharon E. Grubin, United States…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. RaddatzSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Mary B. v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- O'Connor v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2020